|
NO special provision was made for the recruitment of women
into the Guyana Defence Force (GDF) when the Defence Ordinance was passed
by the National Assembly in May 1966 although it is true that, during
the debate on the Defence Bill, PNC spokesmen did promise that women would
be enlisted into the new Force.
No attempt to do so was made for the remainder of 1966, the year when
the GDF came into existence, however, and, given the PNC's domination
of the policy-making Guyana Defence Board (GDB) from the start, the delay
in recruiting women into the Force and the alleged resistance to their
employment were surprising. More odd was Prime Minister Forbes Burnham's
belated complaint about this apparent controversy Ambiguity and ambivalence
have afflicted official policy towards women soldiers since the establishment
of the Women Army Corps (WAC) 35 years ago. All earlier military forces
in Guyana-such as the British Guiana Militia and the British Guiana Volunteer
Force-were exclusively male and, inevitably, the tradition of treating
the military profession as a male preserve was deep-rooted.
Policy Drift: which came to light only in 1977, ten years after the
WAC was formed. Burnham said: "I recall that when we first recruited
women into the Guyana Defence Force, the then Chief-of-Staff [Col Ronald
Pope] thought that women should be allocated to secretarial duties and
telephone operating. I gave an instruction then and I hope that that instruction
has been carried out. Though perhaps women should get first choice on
secretarial and telephone duties, they must understand that they are soldiers
and the price ... which they pay for equality and being in the Guyana
Defence Force must be their ability to do anything the men can do as well,
if not better." The question as to exactly what women soldiers were
meant to do and whether, indeed, they should be able 'to do anything the
men can do' has plagued official policy to this day, creating a crisis
of identity for military planners.
Origins: The establishment of the GDF's Women's Army Corps (WAC) which
turns 35 on 6 February 2002, arguably, was a direct result of Venezuela's
seizure of Ankoko Is. in the Cuyuni River in October 1966. In that year
of Guyana's Independence, the GDF had barely established its first battalion
of fewer than 500 men when it was forced to deploy troops to Eteringbang
on the country's westernmost frontier to confront Venezuela's aggression.
The sudden removal of such a large number of men from such a small force,
some mere recruits still undergoing basic training, others deployed along
the coastland which only two years earlier had been the scene of murderous
ethnic strife, created huge manpower problems. Soldiers had to be found
quickly to secure the borders and others had to take their place in the
camps. The GDF's solution was to recruit women.
In 30 January 1967, just three months after the Ankoko incident, four
women-Captain Joan Granger and Officer Cadets Brenda Aaron, Clarissa Hookumchand
and Hyacinth King - started training at the GDF Training Wing at what
was then called Atkinson Field, now Timehri. On 6 February, 56 other women
joined them as recruits. After six weeks of training in drill, fieldcraft,
skill-at-arms, shooting and physical fitness, the 60 were formally inducted
into the GDF at a parade on 12 March inspected by Mrs. Winifred Gaskin,
then Minister of Education (see image below). Starting with a strength
of 60 in 1967, the Women's Army Corps reached its greatest strength of
268 in 1977. It fell to 247 in 1987 and thereafter, declined slowly. There
were 190 women soldiers serving in the GDF in 1997 and 260 at the start
of 2002.
Reserve: There is some evidence to support the charge that the idea
of recruiting women into the Force was resisted, despite the growing demand
for more troops to meet the country's defence needs. In fact, the day
after their proud "passing out parade," the women were all sent
back home. Thereafter, they were to be called up only when required, as
in any military reserve.
Initially, women soldiers were required to enlist in the 2nd battalion-the
GDF's reserve - only for three years and training was geared to prepare
them for their "specific role" in the Force. The age requirement
of women was 18 to 25 years but, in exceptional cases, women over 25 years
with specialist qualifications were considered. Women were paid, trained
and treated as temporary reservists who could be `disembodied', or have
their full-time service stopped at any time if their post became redundant
or they ceased to fulfill employment standards. Indeed, the official role
of the WAC was stated clearly: "To provide a body of trained officers
and women to be a ready reserve in any type of emergency, and to reinforce
the regular element and replace men in non-combatant duties."
Eventually, a few women were 'embodied' into the Force, not as a group,
but as individuals, and were destined to become auxiliaries to male soldiers
filling posts as clerks, cooks, typists, nurses, radio and telephone operators,
and storekeepers - in camps and bases. This pattern continued until 1969
when the majority of these female reservists were transferred to the regular
force. Recruitment policy changed mainly because Guyana's defence situation
continued to deteriorate. After the Rupununi insurrection of January 1969,
more male troops had to be deployed to that part of the Guyana-Brazil
border and, in August 1969, another major military operation against the
Surinamese incursion in the New River obliged the GDF to station troops
on that sector of the Guyana-Suriname border as well. The continuous drain
of trained troops was unsustainable without replacements. On 26 September
1969, only one month after the Surinamese problem, the second batch of
women soldiers joined the GDF and, from that time, they were given combat
training.
Access: The change of official policy was accelerated also by the
declaration of 1975 as the 'International Year of Women' by the United
Nations and may have been driven by the rapid rise of feminist groups
and the introduction of gender issues into the public debate. These factors
influenced the PNC Administration to adopt a more enlightened approach
to women's issues, a policy which had an effect on the WAC. The State
Paper on Equality for Women was presented to the National Assembly on
15 January 1976, aimed, among other things, at: "... securing equality
of treatment by employers of men and women workers as regards terms and
conditions of service and generally for the purpose of making sex discrimination
unlawful in employment, recruitment, training, education and the provision
of housing, goods, services and facilities to the public." The new
politically-driven approach sought to grant women access to equitable
training and employment in the GDF as well. Already in January 1975, at
the start of "International Women's Year," Cheryl Pickering
and Beverly Drakes were enrolled at the Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
in Florida, USA, returning to Guyana the following year with commercial
pilot's certificates to join the GDF Air Corps. In 1977, Barbara Adams
became the country's first female helicopter pilot after graduating from
the Oxford Air Training School in the UK with a commercial helicopter
pilot's certificate.
Other women were sent on similar courses, some failing to qualify but,
within a decade of this bold initiative, the experiment slowed to a trickle.
The reason for this, occurring in the depressed decade of the 1980s, may
have been primarily financial, but it was remarkable that, despite their
experience, training and qualifications, women pilots were rarely, if
ever, allowed to fly 'in command' of military aircraft.
Ceiling: a few officers were given the opportunity to attend "attachments"
and "on the job training" overseas. For example, Michalene Payne
was trained at the British Army Public Relations Department; Joan Granger
was trained at the Army School of Catering, and Brenda Aaron at the Women's
Royal Army Corps (WRAC), all in the UK. The doors to regular officer training
in Guyana were opened on 16 May 1976 when eight women - four civilians
and four soldiers - were admitted to the Standard Officers Course (SOC)
which all cadets must complete before being commissioned as officers.
Access to the most advanced staff training in countries such as Brazil,
Canada, India, the UK and USA where senior officers were prepared for
high command, however, seemed closed to women. On the other hand, women
have been pursuing advanced studies at the University of Guyana and have
attended overseas courses in regional and hemispheric studies, disaster
preparedness, intelligence and peacekeeping. As a result, it seemed that
a 'glass ceiling' was imperceptibly drawn over the heads of women. In
35 years, only three women have reached the rank of lieutenant colonel
and only one has reached the rank of Warrant Officer Class I, the highest
enlisted rank.
Although they continued to fill mainly traditional positions, women were
given access in increasing numbers to other trades as artisans, cartographers,
drivers, electricians, carpenters, mechanics, painters, plumbers, radio
operators and tailors. Women soldiers also mounted a ceremonial guard
of honour for Prime Minister Sirimavo Bandaranaike of Sri Lanka during
her state visit to Guyana, enjoying the privilege of that most sacred
military ritual of carrying the Force "colour" on parade. 'All
women' detachments also participated in the ceremonial 'Changing of the
Guard' at Guyana House - the President's residence - and Remembrance Day
parades. These novelties had spectacular, but superficial, effects and
did not address the core question of women's long-term role in the Force.
To be fair, few countries have satisfactorily achieved a good balance
between the military roles of men and women. Frequently, employment could
be determined as much by operational necessity as by the desire to avoid
sexual scandals arising out of harassment, or exploitation arising out
of inequalities in rank.
Egalitarianism: during "International Women's Year" also,
the Administration announced the establishment of an 'operational unit'
with the aim to deploy women soldiers to hinterland areas to be involved
in "defence and development duties." According to Beverly Daw,
writing in the Guyana Graphic newspaper, 19 women non-commissioned officers
were trained, six of whom were posted to the GDF Training Corps to train
special recruits for proposed unit in "skill-at-arms; jungle warfare;
navigation and all the other necessary aspects of security work they will
be expected to perform."
This unit never materialized, however, and must have been regarded as
impractical, despite the political hype in which it was conceived. Women
did participate in rugged field tactical exercises at the Force's battle
school at Tacama and in other training areas but were never to be deployed
on 'combat' or operational missions. After making a comparative analysis
of experiments in introducing women to combat assignments in Canada, Israel
and the USA, Christine King, in an article entitled 'Women in Combat',
concluded that the GDF was "not sufficiently experienced nor is it
fully equipped to enlist women for combat" and, despite the enthusiasm
of a few, she did not support the idea for the GDF. She pointed to the
resistance, even by women, to the Canadian Armed Forces' attempt in their
1980s Combat-Related Employment of Women (CREW) trials, to integrate women
fully into combat units.
In Guyana, resistance to proposals for a combat role for women came both
from the women themselves and men. On the one hand, many women soldiers
were mothers and all liable to suffer as much from the stress of being
separated from their young children as from the discomfort of lengthy
periods of exposure to field operations and conditions. On the other hand,
men, particularly commanders, were apprehensive of the social and administrative
problems which could arise when males and females were kept together in
the field, away from their homes and families. In a survey entitled, "Women
Soldiers of the Guyana Defence Force and their Effect on the Military
Organisation in Terms of Roles," which studied the attitudes of men
to women soldiers, Brenda Aaron found that 76 per cent of men felt that
the presence of women soldiers created specific problems for the GDF administration
in four major areas: fitness for the primary task of soldiering; pregnancy,
children and the home; transitional period from civilian to military occupation
and women's intimate relations with male superiors.
Women sometimes combine the roles of soldier, wife, mother and, usually,
homemaker and householder. Domestic problems often erupt which conflict
with their occupational obligations and, consequently, have to be dealt
with by the GDF administration. As a result, Aaron found, some male soldiers
are skeptical about the presence of women in the Force because they felt
that women's problems created increased organisational strains, making
the men's burden heavier. These issues seemed to be insoluble, the GDF
largely skirting around the debate and contenting itself with simply employing
women to perform their traditional trades. This course of action avoids
unpleasantness and achieves the aim of freeing men to perform operational
tasks.
Women's Army Corps in 1967.
Problem: despite the claim that it was always part of the plan
to enlist women into the GDF on the basis of equality with men, the regulatory
framework for protecting women from abuse, and for ensuring good order
and military discipline, has been inadequate. This came about, perhaps,
because some types of social problems could not have been anticipated
and a misplaced belief in absolute egalitarianism obviated the need to
promulgate separate regulations for men and women.
As time went by, it was revealed in a survey cited by Christine King that
75 per cent of female soldiers had one or two children, and some others
had more. In response to that reality in the early years of the WAC, women
were simply "disembodied" if it was felt that pregnancy or motherhood
was interfering with their performance of duty. But this was quickly found
to be both an unreasonable and uneconomical method of managing skilled
soldiers. It was later to become unlawful as well. As a result, a sort
of 'family code' was drafted, aimed mainly at the 'pregnancy problem'.
Regulations governing pregnancy stipulate that women soldiers may allow
themselves to become pregnant for the first time only after two years
of service and, thereafter, only once every two years and no more than
a maximum of three times during their military service.
Once their pregnancy is certified by the GDF Medical Officer, women soldiers
are exempted strenuous physical exercise but are required to perform routine
duties. Maternity leave commences six weeks prior to the expected date
of confinement, soldiers being allowed a period of 13 weeks maternity
leave with pay in accordance with National Insurance Scheme (NIS) conditions.
It is presumed that other aspects of sexual relations likely to have disruptive
effects on GDF administration were thoroughly investigated but were left
unregulated. Problems must have arisen, for example, in cases where women
had to be stationed away from their children; where spouses were separated
or were liable to serve in the same unit; where children had to be maintained;
where there were sexual relations between soldiers or officers of different
ranks; and where there was sexual and spousal abuse.
As a result, a Welfare Department was established through which trained
social workers attempted to deal with these family matters, supporting
the new legal regime guaranteeing women's equality. The staff of this
Department would pay visits to homes and hospitals, investigate cases
and make recommendations to commanding officers for corrective action.
Identity: apart from the establishment of a Welfare Department,
several other efforts were made to soften the harshness of military service
for women. A choir was formed, performing at various functions and institutions
such as hospitals; special sports such as hockey and netball were introduced;
a Co-operative Credit Union was established to encourage thrift and the
WAC was affiliated to the Conference on the Affairs and Status of Women,
in Guyana (CASWIG).
At one stage, in October 1976, perhaps as a result of overzealous egalitarianism,
the WAC was actually disbanded and women formerly called "WACs"
now had to be formally referred to as 'female soldiers'. The original
title was restored when it was found that, despite the fact that the women
could not function as single military corps, there were good reasons for
them to be treated 'differently' and for a commanding officer of their
own.
Today, women can be found in almost every Corps (i.e., specialized branch)
of the Force but, nevertheless, are treated collectively as members of
the Women's Army Corps only for administrative purposes such as accommodation,
social events and training exercises. As a result, the WAC now possesses
its own emblem (the Victoria Regia Lily with crossed rifles), flag (the
emblem on a mauve background), and Regimental march. The Corps celebrates
its formation day on 6 February every year.
In theory, women in the GDF enjoy equal status to men: they compete with
them in training and, within their respective corps for promotion. They
suffer similar sanctions when they commit offences; receive equal pay
within their ranks; undergo similar training, and benefit from all the
privileges of military life as do the male soldiers. The underlying belief
is that, given the opportunity to be properly trained, women can carry
out almost any function that is required of men.
Despite Forbes Burnham's bravado, however, the concept of "women
in combat" never took root. By and large, women seem satisfied with
their identity as soldiers within the stated parameters and have settled
into traditional employment.
Thirty-five years after the WAC was established, there is unlikely to
be a surge of enthusiasm for sudden change.
|
|